EuropeSouth AsiaAsia PacificAmericasMiddle EastAfricaBBC HomepageWorld ServiceEducation
BBC Homepagelow graphics version | feedback | help
BBC News Online
 You are in: Education
Front Page 
World 
UK 
UK Politics 
Business 
Sci/Tech 
Health 
Education 
Features 
How the Education Systems Work 
Sport 
Entertainment 
Talking Point 
In Depth 
AudioVideo 
Monday, 6 December, 1999, 02:22 GMT
Grammar schools 'make little difference'
grammar boys The report says grammar schools benefit from better resources

There is little difference between the academic performance of the grammar and comprehensive school systems, according to a new study.

Experts at the University of London's Institute of Education have evaluated research carried out into both school systems since the 1960s.

Their study shows evidence suggests more able children tend to do better in grammar schools. It also suggests less able children appear to do better in comprehensives, rather than secondary modern schools.

But it concludes that the differences in both cases are very small.

The study, The Grammar School Question, has been published as a heated debate rages about the future of selective education.

petition Campaigners want ballots on the future of grammar schools
It outlines current policy on grammar schools, and discusses the issue of parental ballots to decide whether grammars should stay or go.

It also explains the ideological leanings, and strengths and weaknesses, of various works of research.

The authors say the "superior" achievements of the more academically able pupils in grammar schools cannot be assumed to be caused by the schools' selective nature.

They suggest they could instead be due to better resources and teaching often enjoyed by grammar schools.

'Constructive dialogue'

Dr Sally Power, who wrote the study with colleagues Dr David Crook and Professor Geoff Whitty, said: "Better qualified teachers tend to want to teach the most able children.

"Grammar schools usually have post-16 education because they have sixth forms. This also attracts teachers, and means the schools have more resources as the funding per pupil schools receive increases with age."

The study ends by discussing some of the consequences of abolishing or retaining selective education.

It argues that "developing successful comprehensive education ... is likely to require a broader cultural shift if anxious parents, pupils and teachers ... are to be persuaded that comprehensive schools can provide as good an education as grammar schools".

Dr Power said: "We wanted to have a more constructive dialogue about the issue. In the debates about the future of grammar schools, people are using all the ammunition they have - this puts that ammunition in perspective."

But she pointed out that the study only considered the school systems in terms of academic achievement. It did not take into account other factors, such as social objectives.

Search BBC News Online

Advanced search options
Launch console
BBC RADIO NEWS
BBC ONE TV NEWS
WORLD NEWS SUMMARY
PROGRAMMES GUIDE

See also:
02 Dec 99 |  Education
Blunkett's clash with Tories over grammars
04 Nov 99 |  Education
Comprehensives beat grammars at GCSE
20 Oct 99 |  Education
Kent warned over cost of ending grammars
19 Oct 99 |  Education
Battle lines drawn up over grammar schools
06 Oct 99 |  Education
Peer pressure on grammar schools
04 Oct 99 |  Education
Parents campaign to save grammars

Internet links:

The BBC is not responsible for the content of external internet sites
Links to other Education stories are at the foot of the page.


E-mail this story to a friend

Links to more Education stories



Trending Now