This article extends the idea that that human beings should take responsibility for the consequences of their actions, and applies it to cases of pregnancy and abortion.
This article extends the idea that that human beings should take responsibility for the consequences of their actions, and applies it to cases of pregnancy and abortion.
Most people think that human beings should take responsibility for the consequences of their actions.
And so they say that abortion is wrong where the mother willingly had sex, not because of the moral status of the foetus but because of the responsibilities of the mother.
To put it more formally:
If you voluntarily act in a way that brings about the existence of a person or a foetus, then you have a responsibility to maintain the life of that person or foetus.
So abortion is wrong where the mother had sex of her own free will.
Sure a woman has the right to choose whether or not to become pregnant. She makes that choice before engaging in sex. To make that 'choice' after a pregnancy is underway, merely as a matter of birth control, is an immoral act.
Mona Charen
This argument works well even if you don't accept that a foetus is a moral person, which is why both terms have been used.
But suppose that a woman has not willingly taken the risk of getting pregnant and so did not have any choice in the conception (perhaps she has been raped, for example).
In this case the woman does not have any responsibility for the foetus and so it seems that abortion is not wrong.
This makes it clear that the vital plank of the argument is not the rights of the foetus, but the duties of the mother.
It might get trickier where the woman has been using a reliable contraceptive method. She could argue that it would not be wrong to abort the foetus because she did not willingly take the risk of getting pregnant: she took every possible precaution to avoid pregnancy.
The strict logic of the argument is that sometimes very remote possibilities do happen, they do have consequences, and people should take responsibility for them. The result in this case is that the mother is responsible for the foetus and should not abort it.
The waters become even more muddied when the woman does not understand, or is incapable of understanding, that sexual intercourse leads to pregnancy. She may live in an area where sex education is inadequate, for example.
In such cases, the woman has not knowingly risked pregnancy and could be considered less responsible for the consequences of her actions.
The power of the responsibility argument can be seen by changing genders. Most people would apply the argument that sex has consequences to men without any worries at all.
Once a man has parted with his sperm he is considered totally responsible for any pregnancy that results, and for the child thereafter. Few people would think it morally right for the man to demand an abortion in order to escape his responsibilities.
BBC Β© 2014The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.
This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.